* Create typed ActorMaterializer from ActorContext to bind stream's lifecycle with an actor's lifecycle
* Add Java API for creating typed ActorMaterializer from ActorContext
* Makes the combination more visable
* You don't have to worry about the persistenceId, only EntityTypeKey and entityId
* The glue is stronger in the javadsl because of two reasons
* Couldn't realisticly create a PersistentEntity class extending PersistenBehavior (which
contains all the optional parameters and functions) since that would duplicate too much.
* The ActorContext would be needed in the ShardedEntityContext parameter and because of the
additional M type parameters the type inference breaks down when using the factory. Would
require specifying the type of the ShardedEntityContex[M] parameter. That problem doesn't
seem to exist in Java.
renamed:
s/ShardedEntityContext/EntityContext/
s/ShardedEntity/Entity/
* PersistenceId type to differentiate between persistenceId and entityId, #25703
* both entityId (for sharding) and persistenceId as String types was easy
mix-up
* utility method in EntityTypeKey to concatenaty the type and entityId to
a unique persistenceId
* support custom separator to enable compatilbility with Lagom's javadsl
* Also cleanup javadsl Receive, which is only used from AbstractBehavior
* Clarify further in docs that the functional vs OO style is a matter of taste
Importing com.typesafe.sslconfig.* with the sslconfig version results
in OSGi bundle imports which also include com.typesafe.sslconfig.akka,
which can’t be satisfied with the given version range. Splitting up
the imported packages (com.typesafe.sslconfig,
com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.*, com.typesafe.sslconfig.util.*) results
in tighter-scoped imports which can be satisfied.
This fixes#25579.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <skitt@redhat.com>
* Fix for issue #25616
I haven't had a chance to test this, but it looks to me that this is the solution to issue #25616.
My stacktrace in this issue is this:
```
java.lang.NullPointerException
at eu.phy_awaas.irods.typed.lockingsystem.IRODSLockManagerSpec.$anonfun$new$20(IRODSLockManagerSpec.scala:91)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.internal.TestProbeImpl.loop$1(TestProbeImpl.scala:189)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.internal.TestProbeImpl.loop$1(TestProbeImpl.scala:201)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.internal.TestProbeImpl.fishForMessage_internal(TestProbeImpl.scala:215)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.internal.TestProbeImpl.fishForMessage_internal(TestProbeImpl.scala:45)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.scaladsl.TestProbe.fishForMessage(TestProbe.scala:175)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.scaladsl.TestProbe.fishForMessage$(TestProbe.scala:174)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.internal.TestProbeImpl.fishForMessage(TestProbeImpl.scala:45)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.scaladsl.TestProbe.fishForMessage(TestProbe.scala:181)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.scaladsl.TestProbe.fishForMessage$(TestProbe.scala:180)
at akka.actor.testkit.typed.internal.TestProbeImpl.fishForMessage(TestProbeImpl.scala:45)
at eu.phy_awaas.irods.typed.lockingsystem.IRODSLockManagerSpec.$anonfun$new$18(IRODSLockManagerSpec.scala:88)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:83)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:104)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:22)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:20)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike$$anon$1.apply(WordSpecLike.scala:1078)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture(TestSuite.scala:196)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture$(TestSuite.scala:195)
at org.scalatest.WordSpec.withFixture(WordSpec.scala:1881)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.invokeWithFixture$1(WordSpecLike.scala:1076)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(WordSpecLike.scala:1088)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:289)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.runTest(WordSpecLike.scala:1088)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.runTest$(WordSpecLike.scala:1070)
at org.scalatest.WordSpec.runTest(WordSpec.scala:1881)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(WordSpecLike.scala:1147)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:396)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:389)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:384)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsInBranch(Engine.scala:373)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:410)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:389)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:384)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsInBranch(Engine.scala:373)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:410)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:389)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:384)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsInBranch(Engine.scala:379)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsImpl(Engine.scala:461)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.runTests(WordSpecLike.scala:1147)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.runTests$(WordSpecLike.scala:1146)
at org.scalatest.WordSpec.runTests(WordSpec.scala:1881)
at org.scalatest.Suite.run(Suite.scala:1147)
at org.scalatest.Suite.run$(Suite.scala:1129)
at org.scalatest.WordSpec.org$scalatest$WordSpecLike$$super$run(WordSpec.scala:1881)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.$anonfun$run$1(WordSpecLike.scala:1192)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runImpl(Engine.scala:521)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.run(WordSpecLike.scala:1192)
at org.scalatest.WordSpecLike.run$(WordSpecLike.scala:1190)
at eu.phy_awaas.irods.typed.lockingsystem.IRODSLockManagerSpec.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterAll$$super$run(IRODSLockManagerSpec.scala:22)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.liftedTree1$1(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:213)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:210)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run$(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:208)
at eu.phy_awaas.irods.typed.lockingsystem.IRODSLockManagerSpec.run(IRODSLockManagerSpec.scala:22)
at org.scalatest.tools.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.scala:45)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun$13(Runner.scala:1340)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun$13$adapted(Runner.scala:1334)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:389)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun(Runner.scala:1334)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter$24(Runner.scala:1031)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter$24$adapted(Runner.scala:1010)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.withClassLoaderAndDispatchReporter(Runner.scala:1500)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter(Runner.scala:1010)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.run(Runner.scala:850)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner.run(Runner.scala)
at org.jetbrains.plugins.scala.testingSupport.scalaTest.ScalaTestRunner.runScalaTest2(ScalaTestRunner.java:131)
at org.jetbrains.plugins.scala.testingSupport.scalaTest.ScalaTestRunner.main(ScalaTestRunner.java:28)
```
With the calling code looking like this:
```scala
val lockResults =
probe.fishForMessage(Duration.create(10000, "ms"))(l => {
r += 1
if (r < 5) {
l.lock.use(())//crash happens here
FishingOutcomes.continue
} else {
l.lock.use(())
FishingOutcomes.complete
}
})
```
It's pretty obvious receiveOne(timeout) returns a null when it receives nothing before the timeout, passes that along to my fisher function, which tries to perform work on the supposed message only to get a null instead.
* Added missing brace
* Manually formatted my code the way akka likes
I don't have the set up to compile this right now, so I just manually inserted the formatting that jenkins mentioned.
* More changes to fit the akka formatting standard
* Test for the new assertion error when fishing times out.
* Cleaned up a flaw I added from when I initially put this in async spec
* Cleanup ActorContextSpec output
* Default to not log dead letters and hide up to info level from tests
* Use log instead of println to benefit from config to silence
* The silence of the AdapterSpec
* Hushed the AskSpec
* Subdue the TimerSpec
* Muffled the FaultToleranceDocTest
* Remove the application.conf from the test in waiting for #25708
These are the additional binary API changes introduced:
[error] * class com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.FakeKeyStore is declared final in current version
[error] filter with: ProblemFilters.exclude[FinalClassProblem]("com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.FakeKeyStore")
[error] * method GeneratedKeyStore()java.lang.String in class com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.FakeKeyStore does not have a correspondent in current version
[error] filter with: ProblemFilters.exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem]("com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.FakeKeyStore.GeneratedKeyStore")
[error] * method SignatureAlgorithmOID()sun.security.util.ObjectIdentifier in class com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.FakeKeyStore does not have a correspondent in current version
[error] filter with: ProblemFilters.exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem]("com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.FakeKeyStore.SignatureAlgorithmOID")
[error] * method SignatureAlgorithmName()java.lang.String in class com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.FakeKeyStore does not have a correspondent in current version
[error] filter with: ProblemFilters.exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem]("com.typesafe.sslconfig.ssl.FakeKeyStore.SignatureAlgorithmName")
We use the old DNS protocol ourselves, and the old implementation (which is
still the default) does not support the new protocol. For now the old protocol
is fine and works with both the default and the async impl.
