raboof/pekko
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases 6 Packages Wiki Activity Actions 10

=str #15859 Eliminate usage of Stash mailbox

Browse source 
* As reported in #16522 Stash is slow
* Nothing fancy here, but should be more efficient than Stash
This commit is contained in:
Patrik Nordwall 2015-02-02 12:14:41 +01:00
parent 83e91f770b
commit a165de74b3
6 changed files with 49 additions and 26 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

11
akka-stream/src/main/scala/akka/stream/impl/io/TcpConnectionStream.scala
View file

@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ import akka.io.Tcp._
import akka.stream.ActorFlowMaterializerSettings
import akka.stream.StreamTcpException
import org.reactivestreams.Processor
import akka.actor.Stash
import akka.stream.impl._
import akka.actor.ActorLogging
@ -37,7 +36,7 @@ private[akka] object TcpStreamActor {
/**
* INTERNAL API
*/
private[akka] abstract class TcpStreamActor(val settings: ActorFlowMaterializerSettings) extends Actor with Stash
private[akka] abstract class TcpStreamActor(val settings: ActorFlowMaterializerSettings) extends Actor
with ActorLogging {
import TcpStreamActor._
@ -169,13 +168,11 @@ private[akka] abstract class TcpStreamActor(val settings: ActorFlowMaterializerS
override protected def pumpFailed(e: Throwable): Unit = fail(e)
}
final override def receive = {
// FIXME using Stash mailbox is not the best for performance, we probably want a better solution to this
case ep: ExposedPublisher ⇒
final override def receive = new ExposedPublisherReceive(activeReceive, unhandled) {
override def receiveExposedPublisher(ep: ExposedPublisher): Unit = {
primaryOutputs.subreceive(ep)
context become activeReceive
unstashAll()
case _ ⇒ stash()
}
}
def activeReceive =