+doc akka typed java docs made into paradox and mima fixed
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4c5b43c9d
commit
9bcc7dbd35
4 changed files with 141 additions and 186 deletions
|
|
@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
|
|||
Actors
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
.. toctree::
|
||||
:maxdepth: 2
|
||||
|
||||
actors
|
||||
typed
|
||||
fault-tolerance
|
||||
dispatchers
|
||||
mailboxes
|
||||
routing
|
||||
fsm
|
||||
persistence
|
||||
persistence-schema-evolution
|
||||
persistence-query
|
||||
persistence-query-leveldb
|
||||
testing
|
||||
typed-actors
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
|
|||
@@@ index
|
||||
|
||||
* [actors](actors.md)
|
||||
* [typed](typed.md)
|
||||
* [fault-tolerance](fault-tolerance.md)
|
||||
* [dispatchers](dispatchers.md)
|
||||
* [mailboxes](mailboxes.md)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,50 +1,48 @@
|
|||
.. _typed-java:
|
||||
# Akka Typed
|
||||
|
||||
##########
|
||||
Akka Typed
|
||||
##########
|
||||
@@@ warning
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
|
||||
This module is currently marked as :ref:`may change <may-change>` in the sense
|
||||
This module is currently marked as @ref:[may change](common/may-change.md) in the sense
|
||||
of being the subject of active research. This means that API or semantics can
|
||||
change without warning or deprecation period and it is not recommended to use
|
||||
this module in production just yet—you have been warned.
|
||||
|
||||
As discussed in :ref:`actor-systems` (and following chapters) Actors are about
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
|
||||
As discussed in `actor-systems` (and following chapters) Actors are about
|
||||
sending messages between independent units of computation, but how does that
|
||||
look like? In all of the following these imports are assumed:
|
||||
|
||||
.. includecode:: ../../../akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java#imports
|
||||
@@snip [IntroSpec.scala]($akka$/akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java) { #imports }
|
||||
|
||||
With these in place we can define our first Actor, and of course it will say
|
||||
hello!
|
||||
|
||||
.. includecode:: ../../../akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java#hello-world-actor
|
||||
@@snip [IntroSpec.scala]($akka$/akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java) { #hello-world-actor }
|
||||
|
||||
This small piece of code defines two message types, one for commanding the
|
||||
Actor to greet someone and one that the Actor will use to confirm that it has
|
||||
done so. The :class:`Greet` type contains not only the information of whom to
|
||||
greet, it also holds an :class:`ActorRef` that the sender of the message
|
||||
supplies so that the :class:`HelloWorld` Actor can send back the confirmation
|
||||
done so. The `Greet` type contains not only the information of whom to
|
||||
greet, it also holds an `ActorRef` that the sender of the message
|
||||
supplies so that the `HelloWorld` Actor can send back the confirmation
|
||||
message.
|
||||
|
||||
The behavior of the Actor is defined as the :meth:`greeter` value with the help
|
||||
of the :meth:`immutable` behavior constructor. This constructor is called
|
||||
The behavior of the Actor is defined as the `greeter` value with the help
|
||||
of the `immutable` behavior constructor. This constructor is called
|
||||
immutable because the behavior instance doesn't have or close over any mutable
|
||||
state. Processing the next message may result in a new behavior that can
|
||||
potentially be different from this one. State is updated by returning a new
|
||||
behavior that holds the new immutable state. In this case we don't need to
|
||||
update any state, so we return :class:`Same`.
|
||||
update any state, so we return `Same`.
|
||||
|
||||
The type of the messages handled by this behavior is declared to be of class
|
||||
:class:`Greet`, which implies that the supplied function’s ``msg`` argument is
|
||||
also typed as such. This is why we can access the ``whom`` and ``replyTo``
|
||||
`Greet`, which implies that the supplied function’s `msg` argument is
|
||||
also typed as such. This is why we can access the `whom` and `replyTo`
|
||||
members without needing to use a pattern match.
|
||||
|
||||
On the last line we see the :class:`HelloWorld` Actor send a message to another
|
||||
Actor, which is done using the ``!`` operator (pronounced “tell”). Since the
|
||||
``replyTo`` address is declared to be of type ``ActorRef<Greeted>`` the
|
||||
On the last line we see the `HelloWorld` Actor send a message to another
|
||||
Actor, which is done using the `!` operator (pronounced “tell”). Since the
|
||||
`replyTo` address is declared to be of type `ActorRef<Greeted>` the
|
||||
compiler will only permit us to send messages of this type, other usage will
|
||||
not be accepted.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -52,28 +50,28 @@ The accepted message types of an Actor together with all reply types defines
|
|||
the protocol spoken by this Actor; in this case it is a simple request–reply
|
||||
protocol but Actors can model arbitrarily complex protocols when needed. The
|
||||
protocol is bundled together with the behavior that implements it in a nicely
|
||||
wrapped scope—the ``HelloWorld`` class.
|
||||
wrapped scope—the `HelloWorld` class.
|
||||
|
||||
Now we want to try out this Actor, so we must start an ActorSystem to host it:
|
||||
|
||||
.. includecode:: ../../../akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java#hello-world
|
||||
@@snip [IntroSpec.scala]($akka$/akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java) { #hello-world }
|
||||
|
||||
We start an Actor system from the defined ``greeter`` behavior.
|
||||
We start an Actor system from the defined `greeter` behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
As Carl Hewitt said, one Actor is no Actor—it would be quite lonely with
|
||||
nobody to talk to. In this sense the example is a little cruel because we only
|
||||
give the ``HelloWorld`` Actor a fake person to talk to—the “ask” pattern
|
||||
can be used to send a message such that the reply fulfills a :class:`CompletionStage`.
|
||||
give the `HelloWorld` Actor a fake person to talk to—the “ask” pattern
|
||||
can be used to send a message such that the reply fulfills a `CompletionStage`.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the :class:`CompletionStage` that is returned by the “ask” operation is
|
||||
Note that the `CompletionStage` that is returned by the “ask” operation is
|
||||
properly typed already, no type checks or casts needed. This is possible due to
|
||||
the type information that is part of the message protocol: the ``ask`` operator
|
||||
takes as argument a function that pass an :class:`ActorRef<U>`, which is the
|
||||
``replyTo`` parameter of the ``Greet`` message, which means that when sending
|
||||
the reply message to that :class:`ActorRef` the message that fulfills the
|
||||
:class:`CompletionStage` can only be of type :class:`Greeted`.
|
||||
the type information that is part of the message protocol: the `ask` operator
|
||||
takes as argument a function that pass an `ActorRef<U>`, which is the
|
||||
`replyTo` parameter of the `Greet` message, which means that when sending
|
||||
the reply message to that `ActorRef` the message that fulfills the
|
||||
`CompletionStage` can only be of type `Greeted`.
|
||||
|
||||
We use this here to send the :class:`Greet` command to the Actor and when the
|
||||
We use this here to send the `Greet` command to the Actor and when the
|
||||
reply comes back we will print it out and tell the actor system to shut down and
|
||||
the program ends.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -82,21 +80,16 @@ by the compiler, but this ability is not unlimited, there are bounds to what we
|
|||
can statically express. Before we go on with a more complex (and realistic)
|
||||
example we make a small detour to highlight some of the theory behind this.
|
||||
|
||||
A Little Bit of Theory
|
||||
======================
|
||||
## A Little Bit of Theory
|
||||
|
||||
The `Actor Model`_ as defined by Hewitt, Bishop and Steiger in 1973 is a
|
||||
computational model that expresses exactly what it means for computation to be
|
||||
distributed. The processing units—Actors—can only communicate by exchanging
|
||||
messages and upon reception of a message an Actor can do the following three
|
||||
fundamental actions:
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`Actor Model`: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_model
|
||||
The [Actor Model](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_model) as defined by
|
||||
Hewitt, Bishop and Steiger in 1973 is a computational model that expresses
|
||||
exactly what it means for computation to be distributed. The processing
|
||||
units—Actors—can only communicate by exchanging messages and upon reception of a
|
||||
message an Actor can do the following three fundamental actions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. send a finite number of messages to Actors it knows
|
||||
|
||||
2. create a finite number of new Actors
|
||||
|
||||
3. designate the behavior to be applied to the next message
|
||||
|
||||
The Akka Typed project expresses these actions using behaviors and addresses.
|
||||
|
|
@ -142,24 +135,23 @@ just given by the last message type that was received or sent.
|
|||
|
||||
In the next section we demonstrate this on a more realistic example.
|
||||
|
||||
A More Complex Example
|
||||
======================
|
||||
## A More Complex Example
|
||||
|
||||
Consider an Actor that runs a chat room: client Actors may connect by sending
|
||||
a message that contains their screen name and then they can post messages. The
|
||||
chat room Actor will disseminate all posted messages to all currently connected
|
||||
client Actors. The protocol definition could look like the following:
|
||||
|
||||
.. includecode:: ../../../akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java#chatroom-protocol
|
||||
@@snip [IntroSpec.scala]($akka$/akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java) { #chatroom-protocol }
|
||||
|
||||
Initially the client Actors only get access to an ``ActorRef<GetSession>``
|
||||
Initially the client Actors only get access to an `ActorRef<GetSession>`
|
||||
which allows them to make the first step. Once a client’s session has been
|
||||
established it gets a :class:`SessionGranted` message that contains a ``handle`` to
|
||||
unlock the next protocol step, posting messages. The :class:`PostMessage`
|
||||
established it gets a `SessionGranted` message that contains a `handle` to
|
||||
unlock the next protocol step, posting messages. The `PostMessage`
|
||||
command will need to be sent to this particular address that represents the
|
||||
session that has been added to the chat room. The other aspect of a session is
|
||||
that the client has revealed its own address, via the ``replyTo`` argument, so that subsequent
|
||||
:class:`MessagePosted` events can be sent to it.
|
||||
that the client has revealed its own address, via the `replyTo` argument, so that subsequent
|
||||
`MessagePosted` events can be sent to it.
|
||||
|
||||
This illustrates how Actors can express more than just the equivalent of method
|
||||
calls on Java objects. The declared message types and their contents describe a
|
||||
|
|
@ -167,55 +159,54 @@ full protocol that can involve multiple Actors and that can evolve over
|
|||
multiple steps. The implementation of the chat room protocol would be as simple
|
||||
as the following:
|
||||
|
||||
.. includecode:: ../../../akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java#chatroom-behavior
|
||||
@@snip [IntroSpec.scala]($akka$/akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java) { #chatroom-behavior }
|
||||
|
||||
The core of this behavior is stateful, the chat room itself does not change
|
||||
into something else when sessions are established, but we introduce a variable
|
||||
that tracks the opened sessions. Note that by using a method parameter a ``var``
|
||||
is not needed. When a new :class:`GetSession` command comes in we add that client to the
|
||||
that tracks the opened sessions. Note that by using a method parameter a `var`
|
||||
is not needed. When a new `GetSession` command comes in we add that client to the
|
||||
list that is in the returned behavior. Then we also need to create the session’s
|
||||
:class:`ActorRef` that will be used to post messages. In this case we want to
|
||||
create a very simple Actor that just repackages the :class:`PostMessage`
|
||||
command into a :class:`PostSessionMessage` command which also includes the
|
||||
`ActorRef` that will be used to post messages. In this case we want to
|
||||
create a very simple Actor that just repackages the `PostMessage`
|
||||
command into a `PostSessionMessage` command which also includes the
|
||||
screen name. Such a wrapper Actor can be created by using the
|
||||
:meth:`spawnAdapter` method on the :class:`ActorContext`, so that we can then
|
||||
go on to reply to the client with the :class:`SessionGranted` result.
|
||||
`spawnAdapter` method on the `ActorContext`, so that we can then
|
||||
go on to reply to the client with the `SessionGranted` result.
|
||||
|
||||
The behavior that we declare here can handle both subtypes of :class:`Command`.
|
||||
:class:`GetSession` has been explained already and the
|
||||
:class:`PostSessionMessage` commands coming from the wrapper Actors will
|
||||
The behavior that we declare here can handle both subtypes of `Command`.
|
||||
`GetSession` has been explained already and the
|
||||
`PostSessionMessage` commands coming from the wrapper Actors will
|
||||
trigger the dissemination of the contained chat room message to all connected
|
||||
clients. But we do not want to give the ability to send
|
||||
:class:`PostSessionMessage` commands to arbitrary clients, we reserve that
|
||||
`PostSessionMessage` commands to arbitrary clients, we reserve that
|
||||
right to the wrappers we create—otherwise clients could pose as completely
|
||||
different screen names (imagine the :class:`GetSession` protocol to include
|
||||
authentication information to further secure this). Therefore :class:`PostSessionMessage`
|
||||
has ``private`` visibility and can't be created outside the actor.
|
||||
different screen names (imagine the `GetSession` protocol to include
|
||||
authentication information to further secure this). Therefore `PostSessionMessage`
|
||||
has `private` visibility and can't be created outside the actor.
|
||||
|
||||
If we did not care about securing the correspondence between a session and a
|
||||
screen name then we could change the protocol such that :class:`PostMessage` is
|
||||
removed and all clients just get an :class:`ActorRef<PostSessionMessage>` to
|
||||
screen name then we could change the protocol such that `PostMessage` is
|
||||
removed and all clients just get an `ActorRef<PostSessionMessage>` to
|
||||
send to. In this case no wrapper would be needed and we could just use
|
||||
``ctx.getSelf()``. The type-checks work out in that case because
|
||||
:class:`ActorRef<T>` is contravariant in its type parameter, meaning that we
|
||||
can use a :class:`ActorRef<Command>` wherever an
|
||||
:class:`ActorRef<PostSessionMessage>` is needed—this makes sense because the
|
||||
`ctx.getSelf()`. The type-checks work out in that case because
|
||||
`ActorRef<T>` is contravariant in its type parameter, meaning that we
|
||||
can use a `ActorRef<Command>` wherever an
|
||||
`ActorRef<PostSessionMessage>` is needed—this makes sense because the
|
||||
former simply speaks more languages than the latter. The opposite would be
|
||||
problematic, so passing an :class:`ActorRef<PostSessionMessage>` where
|
||||
:class:`ActorRef<Command>` is required will lead to a type error.
|
||||
problematic, so passing an `ActorRef<PostSessionMessage>` where
|
||||
`ActorRef<Command>` is required will lead to a type error.
|
||||
|
||||
Trying it out
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
### Trying it out
|
||||
|
||||
In order to see this chat room in action we need to write a client Actor that can use it:
|
||||
|
||||
.. includecode:: ../../../akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java#chatroom-gabbler
|
||||
@@snip [IntroSpec.scala]($akka$/akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java) { #chatroom-gabbler }
|
||||
|
||||
From this behavior we can create an Actor that will accept a chat room session,
|
||||
post a message, wait to see it published, and then terminate. The last step
|
||||
requires the ability to change behavior, we need to transition from the normal
|
||||
running behavior into the terminated state. This is why here we do not return
|
||||
:meth:`same`, as above, but another special value :meth:`stopped`.
|
||||
`same`, as above, but another special value `stopped`.
|
||||
|
||||
Now to try things out we must start both a chat room and a gabbler and of
|
||||
course we do this inside an Actor system. Since there can be only one guardian
|
||||
|
|
@ -224,61 +215,59 @@ want—it complicates its logic) or the gabbler from the chat room (which is
|
|||
nonsensical) or we start both of them from a third Actor—our only sensible
|
||||
choice:
|
||||
|
||||
.. includecode:: ../../../akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java#chatroom-main
|
||||
@@snip [IntroSpec.scala]($akka$/akka-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/IntroTest.java) { #chatroom-main }
|
||||
|
||||
In good tradition we call the ``main`` Actor what it is, it directly
|
||||
corresponds to the ``main`` method in a traditional Java application. This
|
||||
In good tradition we call the `main` Actor what it is, it directly
|
||||
corresponds to the `main` method in a traditional Java application. This
|
||||
Actor will perform its job on its own accord, we do not need to send messages
|
||||
from the outside, so we declare it to be of type ``Void``. Actors receive not
|
||||
from the outside, so we declare it to be of type `Void`. Actors receive not
|
||||
only external messages, they also are notified of certain system events,
|
||||
so-called Signals. In order to get access to those we choose to implement this
|
||||
particular one using the :meth:`immutable` behavior decorator. The
|
||||
provided ``onSignal`` function will be invoked for signals (subclasses of :class:`Signal`)
|
||||
or the ``onMessage`` function for user messages.
|
||||
particular one using the `immutable` behavior decorator. The
|
||||
provided `onSignal` function will be invoked for signals (subclasses of `Signal`)
|
||||
or the `onMessage` function for user messages.
|
||||
|
||||
This particular ``main`` Actor is created using `Actor.deferred`, which is like a factory for a behavior.
|
||||
This particular `main` Actor is created using `Actor.deferred`, which is like a factory for a behavior.
|
||||
Creation of the behavior instance is deferred until the actor is started, as opposed to `Actor.immutable`
|
||||
that creates the behavior instance immediately before the actor is running. The factory function in
|
||||
`deferred` pass the `ActorContext` as parameter and that can for example be used for spawning child actors.
|
||||
This ``main`` Actor creates the chat room and the gabbler and the session between them is initiated, and when the
|
||||
gabbler is finished we will receive the :class:`Terminated` event due to having
|
||||
called ``ctx.watch`` for it. This allows us to shut down the Actor system: when
|
||||
This `main` Actor creates the chat room and the gabbler and the session between them is initiated, and when the
|
||||
gabbler is finished we will receive the `Terminated` event due to having
|
||||
called `ctx.watch` for it. This allows us to shut down the Actor system: when
|
||||
the main Actor terminates there is nothing more to do.
|
||||
|
||||
Status of this Project and Relation to Akka Actors
|
||||
==================================================
|
||||
## Status of this Project and Relation to Akka Actors
|
||||
|
||||
Akka Typed is the result of many years of research and previous attempts
|
||||
(including Typed Channels in the 2.2.x series) and it is on its way to
|
||||
stabilization, but maturing such a profound change to the core concept of Akka
|
||||
will take a long time. We expect that this module will stay marked
|
||||
:ref:`may change <may-change>` for multiple major releases of Akka and the
|
||||
plain ``akka.actor.Actor`` will not be deprecated or go away anytime soon.
|
||||
@ref:[may change](common/may-change.md) for multiple major releases of Akka and the
|
||||
plain `akka.actor.Actor` will not be deprecated or go away anytime soon.
|
||||
|
||||
Being a research project also entails that the reference documentation is not
|
||||
as detailed as it will be for a final version, please refer to the API
|
||||
documentation for greater depth and finer detail.
|
||||
|
||||
Main Differences
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
### Main Differences
|
||||
|
||||
The most prominent difference is the removal of the ``sender()`` functionality.
|
||||
The most prominent difference is the removal of the `sender()` functionality.
|
||||
This turned out to be the Achilles heel of the Typed Channels project, it is
|
||||
the feature that makes its type signatures and macros too complex to be viable.
|
||||
The solution chosen in Akka Typed is to explicitly include the properly typed
|
||||
reply-to address in the message, which both burdens the user with this task but
|
||||
also places this aspect of protocol design where it belongs.
|
||||
|
||||
The other prominent difference is the removal of the :class:`Actor` trait. In
|
||||
The other prominent difference is the removal of the `Actor` trait. In
|
||||
order to avoid closing over unstable references from different execution
|
||||
contexts (e.g. Future transformations) we turned all remaining methods that
|
||||
were on this trait into messages: the behavior receives the
|
||||
:class:`ActorContext` as an argument during processing and the lifecycle hooks
|
||||
`ActorContext` as an argument during processing and the lifecycle hooks
|
||||
have been converted into Signals.
|
||||
|
||||
A side-effect of this is that behaviors can now be tested in isolation without
|
||||
having to be packaged into an Actor, tests can run fully synchronously without
|
||||
having to worry about timeouts and spurious failures. Another side-effect is
|
||||
that behaviors can nicely be composed and decorated, see :meth:`tap`, or
|
||||
:meth:`widened` combinators; nothing about these is special or internal, new
|
||||
that behaviors can nicely be composed and decorated, see `tap`, or
|
||||
`widened` combinators; nothing about these is special or internal, new
|
||||
combinators can be written as external libraries or tailor-made for each project.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1158,24 +1158,7 @@ object MiMa extends AutoPlugin {
|
|||
ProblemFilters.exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem]("akka.cluster.sharding.Shard.messageBuffers_="),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem]("akka.cluster.sharding.ShardRegion.totalBufferSize"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[IncompatibleResultTypeProblem]("akka.cluster.sharding.ShardRegion.shardBuffers"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[IncompatibleMethTypeProblem]("akka.cluster.sharding.ShardRegion.shardBuffers_="),
|
||||
|
||||
// #22332 protobuf serializers for remote deployment
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getConfigManifest"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.hasScopeManifest"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getScopeManifestBytes"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getConfigSerializerId"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.hasRouterConfigSerializerId"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.hasRouterConfigManifest"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getRouterConfigSerializerId"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getRouterConfigManifestBytes"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getConfigManifestBytes"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.hasConfigManifest"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.hasScopeSerializerId"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getRouterConfigManifest"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.hasConfigSerializerId"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getScopeSerializerId"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.remote.WireFormats#DeployDataOrBuilder.getScopeManifest")
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[IncompatibleMethTypeProblem]("akka.cluster.sharding.ShardRegion.shardBuffers_=")
|
||||
),
|
||||
"2.4.18" -> Seq(
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
@ -1209,6 +1192,7 @@ object MiMa extends AutoPlugin {
|
|||
ProblemFilters.exclude[InheritedNewAbstractMethodProblem]("akka.stream.Graph.async")
|
||||
),
|
||||
"2.5.1" -> Seq(
|
||||
|
||||
// #22794 watchWith
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.actor.ActorContext.watchWith"),
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.actor.dungeon.DeathWatch.watchWith"),
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue