!act #16125 Timeout Calls through CircuitBreaker.
CircuitBreaker used to wait idenfinitly for a call and only compare duration after the facts. It will now increment its failure count early and throw a TimeoutException or return a Failure[TimeoutException].
This commit is contained in:
parent
c0235ceee6
commit
69387bbc45
3 changed files with 75 additions and 16 deletions
|
|
@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ included ``self.path.parent.name`` to include the cluster type name.
|
|||
In ``2.4.x`` entries are now children of a ``Shard``, which in turn is a child of the local ``ShardRegion``. To include the shard
|
||||
type in the ``persistenceId`` it is now accessed by ``self.path.parent.parent.name`` from each entry.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Circuit Breaker Timeout Change
|
||||
==============================
|
||||
In ``2.3.x`` calls protected by the ``CircuitBreaker`` were allowed to run indefinitely and the check to see if the timeout had been exceeded was done after the call had returned.
|
||||
|
||||
In ``2.4.x`` the failureCount of the Breaker will be increased as soon as the timeout is reached and a ``Failure[TimeoutException]`` will be returned immediately for asynchronous calls. Synchronous calls will now throw a ``TimeoutException`` after the call is finished.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Removed Deprecated Features
|
||||
===========================
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -123,4 +131,3 @@ In order to make cluster routers smarter about when they can start local routees
|
|||
``nrOfInstances`` defined on ``Pool`` now takes ``ActorSystem`` as an argument.
|
||||
In case you have implemented a custom Pool you will have to update the method's signature,
|
||||
however the implementation can remain the same if you don't need to rely on an ActorSystem in your logic.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue