Removing actorClass from ActorRef signature, makes no sense from the perspective of distribution, and with async start it is racy
This commit is contained in:
parent
284a8c4d05
commit
5321d02f64
3 changed files with 0 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ object ActorSerialization {
|
|||
.setAddress(actorRef.address)
|
||||
.setTimeout(actorRef.timeout)
|
||||
|
||||
if (localRef.isDefined)
|
||||
builder.setActorClassname(localRef.get.actorClass.getName) //TODO FIXME Why is the classname needed anymore?
|
||||
|
||||
replicationScheme match {
|
||||
case _: Transient | Transient ⇒
|
||||
builder.setReplicationStorage(ReplicationStorageType.TRANSIENT)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue