Final review feedback
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Batey
parent
d1114495dd
commit
2d9660f847
10 changed files with 27 additions and 21 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
|
|||
# new private method on type that is do not inherit
|
||||
ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("akka.cluster.sharding.typed.scaladsl.EntityRef.asJava")
|
||||
|
|
@ -96,9 +96,8 @@ object ReplicatedShardingSpec extends MultiNodeConfig {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def provider(): ReplicatedEntityProvider[Command, ShardingEnvelope[Command]] = {
|
||||
ReplicatedEntityProvider[Command, ShardingEnvelope[Command]]("TestRES", AllReplicas) {
|
||||
(entityTypeKey, replicaId) =>
|
||||
def provider(): ReplicatedEntityProvider[Command] = {
|
||||
ReplicatedEntityProvider[Command]("TestRES", AllReplicas) { (entityTypeKey, replicaId) =>
|
||||
ReplicatedEntity(replicaId, Entity(entityTypeKey) { entityContext =>
|
||||
Behaviors.setup { ctx =>
|
||||
TestRES(ReplicationId.fromString(entityContext.entityId), ctx)
|
||||
|
|
@ -134,7 +133,7 @@ abstract class ReplicatedShardingSpec
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
"start replicated entities" in {
|
||||
val replicatedSharding: ReplicatedSharding[TestRES.Command, ShardingEnvelope[TestRES.Command]] =
|
||||
val replicatedSharding: ReplicatedSharding[TestRES.Command] =
|
||||
ReplicatedShardingExtension(typedSystem).init(TestRES.provider())
|
||||
|
||||
runOn(first) {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -358,6 +358,8 @@ private[akka] object Shard {
|
|||
// only called once during handoff
|
||||
def activeEntities(): Set[ActorRef] = byRef.keySet.asScala.toSet
|
||||
|
||||
def nrActiveEntities() = byRef.size()
|
||||
|
||||
// only called for getting shard stats
|
||||
def activeEntityIds(): Set[EntityId] = byRef.values.asScala.toSet
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ from the events, or publish the events to other services.
|
|||
|
||||
## Multi-DC Persistence
|
||||
|
||||
This commercial feature has now been superseeded by @ref[Replicated Event Sourcing](../typed/replicated-eventsourcing.md)
|
||||
This commercial feature has now been superseded by @ref[Replicated Event Sourcing](../typed/replicated-eventsourcing.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Cluster with Docker
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Especially when used together with Akka Persistence that is based on the single-
|
|||
it is important to avoid running the same entity at multiple locations at the same time with a
|
||||
shared data store. That would result in corrupt data since the events stored by different instances
|
||||
may be interleaved and would be interpreted differently in a later replay. For replicated persistent
|
||||
entities see @ref[Replciated Event Sourcing](replicated-eventsourcing.md).
|
||||
entities see @ref[Replicated Event Sourcing](replicated-eventsourcing.md).
|
||||
|
||||
If you need global entities you have to pick one data center to host that entity type and only start
|
||||
`ClusterSharding` on nodes of that data center. If the data center is unreachable from another data center the
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Scala
|
|||
Java
|
||||
: @@snip [AuctionExample](/akka-persistence-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/persistence/typed/ReplicatedAuctionExampleTest.java) { #events }
|
||||
|
||||
The winner does not have to pay the highest bid but only enough to beat the second highest so the `highestCounterOffer` is in the `AuctionFinished` event.
|
||||
The winner does not have to pay the highest bid but only enough to beat the second highest, so the `highestCounterOffer` is in the `AuctionFinished` event.
|
||||
|
||||
Let's have a look at the auction entity that will handle incoming commands:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ warning or deprecation period. It is also not recommended to use this module in
|
|||
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
|
||||
@ref[Event sourcing](./persistence.md) with `EventSourcedBehavior`s is based on the single writer principle, which means that there can only be one active instance of a `EventSourcedBehavior` with a given `persistenceId`. Otherwise, multiple instances would store interleaving events based on different states, and when these events would later be replayed it would not be possible to reconstruct the correct state.
|
||||
@ref[Event sourcing](./persistence.md) with `EventSourcedBehavior`s is based on the single writer principle, which means that there can only be one active instance of a `EventSourcedBehavior`
|
||||
with a given `persistenceId`. Otherwise, multiple instances would store interleaving events based on different states, and when these events would later be replayed it would not be possible to reconstruct the correct state.
|
||||
|
||||
This restriction means that in the event of network partitions, and for a short time during rolling re-deploys, some
|
||||
`EventSourcedBehavior` actors are unavailable.
|
||||
|
|
@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ The motivations are:
|
|||
* Balance the load over many servers
|
||||
|
||||
However, the event handler must be able to **handle concurrent events** as when replication is enabled
|
||||
there is no longer the single writer principle as there is with a normal `EventSourcedBehavior`.
|
||||
the single-writer guarantee is not maintained like it is with a normal `EventSourcedBehavior`.
|
||||
|
||||
The state of a replicated `EventSourcedBehavior` is **eventually consistent**. Event replication may be delayed
|
||||
due to network partitions and outages, which means that the event handler and those reading the state must be designed
|
||||
|
|
@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ to handle this.
|
|||
|
||||
To be able to use Replicated Event Sourcing the journal and snapshot store used is required to have specific support for the metadata that the replication needs (see @ref[Journal Support](#journal-support)).
|
||||
|
||||
## Relaxing the single writer principle for availability
|
||||
## Relaxing the single-writer principle for availability
|
||||
|
||||
Taking the example of using Replicated Event Sourcing to run a replica per data center.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ object MultiJournalReplicationSpec {
|
|||
|
||||
private val writeJournalPerReplica = Map("R1" -> "journal1.journal", "R2" -> "journal2.journal")
|
||||
def apply(entityId: String, replicaId: String): Behavior[Command] = {
|
||||
ReplicatedEventSourcing(
|
||||
ReplicatedEventSourcing
|
||||
.perReplicaJournalConfig(
|
||||
ReplicationId("MultiJournalSpec", entityId, ReplicaId(replicaId)),
|
||||
Map(ReplicaId("R1") -> "journal1.query", ReplicaId("R2") -> "journal2.query"))(
|
||||
replicationContext =>
|
||||
Map(ReplicaId("R1") -> "journal1.query", ReplicaId("R2") -> "journal2.query"))(replicationContext =>
|
||||
EventSourcedBehavior[Command, String, Set[String]](
|
||||
replicationContext.persistenceId,
|
||||
Set.empty[String],
|
||||
|
|
@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ object MultiJournalReplicationSpec {
|
|||
case StoreMe(evt, ack) =>
|
||||
Effect.persist(evt).thenRun(_ => ack ! Done)
|
||||
},
|
||||
(state, event) => state + event)).withJournalPluginId(writeJournalPerReplica(replicaId))
|
||||
(state, event) => state + event))
|
||||
.withJournalPluginId(writeJournalPerReplica(replicaId))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ object ReplicatedEventSourcingCompileOnlySpec {
|
|||
//#factory-shared
|
||||
|
||||
//#factory
|
||||
ReplicatedEventSourcing(
|
||||
ReplicatedEventSourcing.perReplicaJournalConfig(
|
||||
ReplicationId("entityTypeHint", "entityId", DCA),
|
||||
Map(DCA -> "journalForDCA", DCB -> "journalForDCB")) { context =>
|
||||
EventSourcedBehavior[Command, State, Event](???, ???, ???, ???)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ lazy val aggregatedProjects: Seq[ProjectReference] = List[ProjectReference](
|
|||
persistenceShared,
|
||||
persistenceTck,
|
||||
persistenceTyped,
|
||||
persistenceTypedTests,
|
||||
persistenceTestkit,
|
||||
protobuf,
|
||||
protobufV3,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue