Refactor example to make it easier to copy-paste #29578 (#29860)

* Refactor example to make it clear #29578

Restructure example

* Fix formatting

* Right formatting to disable format checker
This commit is contained in:
Josep Prat 2020-12-07 09:47:18 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent c931b9bb93
commit 2c659a046e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 91 additions and 65 deletions

View file

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ import akka.actor.typed.receptionist.ServiceKey;
public class RouterTest {
static // #pool
static // #routee
class Worker {
interface Command {}
@ -54,12 +54,14 @@ public class RouterTest {
}
}
// #pool
// #routee
static Behavior<Void> showPoolRouting() {
return Behaviors.setup(
return
// #pool
// This would be defined within your actor class
Behaviors.setup(
context -> {
// #pool
int poolSize = 4;
PoolRouter<Worker.Command> pool =
Routers.pool(
@ -87,7 +89,10 @@ public class RouterTest {
// #strategy
return Behaviors.empty();
// #pool
});
// #pool
}
static Behavior<Void> showGroupRouting() {
@ -95,9 +100,11 @@ public class RouterTest {
ServiceKey<Worker.Command> serviceKey = ServiceKey.create(Worker.Command.class, "log-worker");
// #group
return Behaviors.setup(
return
// #group
Behaviors.setup(
context -> {
// #group
// this would likely happen elsewhere - if we create it locally we
// can just as well use a pool
ActorRef<Worker.Command> worker = context.spawn(Worker.create(), "worker");
@ -106,15 +113,16 @@ public class RouterTest {
GroupRouter<Worker.Command> group = Routers.group(serviceKey);
ActorRef<Worker.Command> router = context.spawn(group, "worker-group");
// the group router will stash messages until it sees the first listing of registered
// the group router will stash messages until it sees the first listing of
// registered
// services from the receptionist, so it is safe to send messages right away
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
router.tell(new Worker.DoLog("msg " + i));
}
// #group
return Behaviors.empty();
});
// #group
}
public static void main(String[] args) {

View file

@ -10,13 +10,12 @@ import akka.actor.testkit.typed.scaladsl.{ LogCapturing, ScalaTestWithActorTestK
import akka.actor.typed.{ Behavior, SupervisorStrategy }
import akka.actor.typed.receptionist.{ Receptionist, ServiceKey }
import akka.actor.typed.scaladsl.{ Behaviors, Routers }
import org.scalatest.wordspec.AnyWordSpecLike
// #pool
import org.scalatest.wordspec.AnyWordSpecLike
object RouterSpec {
// #pool
// #routee
object Worker {
sealed trait Command
case class DoLog(text: String) extends Command
@ -32,11 +31,14 @@ object RouterSpec {
}
}
// #pool
// #routee
// This code is extra indented for visualization purposes
// format: OFF
// #group
val serviceKey = ServiceKey[Worker.Command]("log-worker")
val serviceKey = ServiceKey[Worker.Command]("log-worker")
// #group
// format: ON
}
class RouterSpec extends ScalaTestWithActorTestKit("akka.loglevel=warning") with AnyWordSpecLike with LogCapturing {
@ -54,36 +56,42 @@ class RouterSpec extends ScalaTestWithActorTestKit("akka.loglevel=warning") with
def DoLog(text: String) = RouterSpec.Worker.DoLog(text)
}
spawn(Behaviors.setup[Unit] { ctx =>
spawn(
// #pool
val pool = Routers.pool(poolSize = 4)(
// make sure the workers are restarted if they fail
Behaviors.supervise(Worker()).onFailure[Exception](SupervisorStrategy.restart))
val router = ctx.spawn(pool, "worker-pool")
// This would be defined within your actor object
Behaviors.setup[Unit] { ctx =>
val pool = Routers.pool(poolSize = 4) {
// make sure the workers are restarted if they fail
Behaviors.supervise(Worker()).onFailure[Exception](SupervisorStrategy.restart)
}
val router = ctx.spawn(pool, "worker-pool")
(0 to 10).foreach { n =>
router ! Worker.DoLog(s"msg $n")
}
// #pool
// #pool-dispatcher
// make sure workers use the default blocking IO dispatcher
val blockingPool = pool.withRouteeProps(routeeProps = DispatcherSelector.blocking())
// spawn head router using the same executor as the parent
val blockingRouter = ctx.spawn(blockingPool, "blocking-pool", DispatcherSelector.sameAsParent())
// #pool-dispatcher
blockingRouter ! Worker.DoLog("msg")
// #strategy
val alternativePool = pool.withPoolSize(2).withRoundRobinRouting()
// #strategy
val alternativeRouter = ctx.spawn(alternativePool, "alternative-pool")
alternativeRouter ! Worker.DoLog("msg")
//#pool
Behaviors.empty
(0 to 10).foreach { n =>
router ! Worker.DoLog(s"msg $n")
}
// #pool
// #pool-dispatcher
// make sure workers use the default blocking IO dispatcher
val blockingPool = pool.withRouteeProps(routeeProps = DispatcherSelector.blocking())
// spawn head router using the same executor as the parent
val blockingRouter = ctx.spawn(blockingPool, "blocking-pool", DispatcherSelector.sameAsParent())
// #pool-dispatcher
blockingRouter ! Worker.DoLog("msg")
// #strategy
val alternativePool = pool.withPoolSize(2).withRoundRobinRouting()
// #strategy
val alternativeRouter = ctx.spawn(alternativePool, "alternative-pool")
alternativeRouter ! Worker.DoLog("msg")
Behaviors.empty
})
//#pool
)
probe.receiveMessages(11)
}
@ -98,25 +106,27 @@ class RouterSpec extends ScalaTestWithActorTestKit("akka.loglevel=warning") with
def DoLog(text: String) = RouterSpec.Worker.DoLog(text)
}
spawn(Behaviors.setup[Unit] { ctx =>
spawn(
// #group
// this would likely happen elsewhere - if we create it locally we
// can just as well use a pool
val worker = ctx.spawn(Worker(), "worker")
ctx.system.receptionist ! Receptionist.Register(serviceKey, worker)
Behaviors.setup[Unit] { ctx =>
// this would likely happen elsewhere - if we create it locally we
// can just as well use a pool
val worker = ctx.spawn(Worker(), "worker")
ctx.system.receptionist ! Receptionist.Register(serviceKey, worker)
val group = Routers.group(serviceKey)
val router = ctx.spawn(group, "worker-group")
val group = Routers.group(serviceKey)
val router = ctx.spawn(group, "worker-group")
// the group router will stash messages until it sees the first listing of registered
// services from the receptionist, so it is safe to send messages right away
(0 to 10).foreach { n =>
router ! Worker.DoLog(s"msg $n")
// the group router will stash messages until it sees the first listing of registered
// services from the receptionist, so it is safe to send messages right away
(0 to 10).foreach { n =>
router ! Worker.DoLog(s"msg $n")
}
Behaviors.empty
}
// #group
Behaviors.empty
})
)
probe.receiveMessages(10)
}

View file

@ -16,17 +16,17 @@ To use Akka Actor Typed, you must add the following dependency in your project:
## Introduction
In some cases it is useful to distribute messages of the same type over a set of actors, so that messages can be
processed in parallel - a single actor will only process one message at a time.
In some cases it is useful to distribute messages of the same type over a set of actors, so that messages can be
processed in parallel - a single actor will only process one message at a time.
The router itself is a behavior that is spawned into a running actor that will then forward any message sent to it
to one final recipient out of the set of routees.
There are two kinds of routers included in Akka Typed - the pool router and the group router.
There are two kinds of routers included in Akka Typed - the pool router and the group router.
## Pool Router
The pool router is created with a routee `Behavior` and spawns a number of children with that behavior which it will
The pool router is created with a routee `Behavior` and spawns a number of children with that behavior which it will
then forward messages to.
If a child is stopped the pool router removes it from its set of routees. When the last child stops the router itself stops.
@ -34,6 +34,16 @@ To make a resilient router that deals with failures the routee `Behavior` must b
As actor children are always local the routees are never spread across a cluster with a pool router.
Let's first introduce the routee:
Scala
: @@snip [RouterSpec.scala](/akka-actor-typed-tests/src/test/scala/docs/akka/typed/RouterSpec.scala) { #routee }
Java
: @@snip [RouterTest.java](/akka-actor-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/RouterTest.java) { #routee }
After having defined the routee, we can now concentrate on configuring the router itself. Note again the the router is an Actor in itself:
Scala
: @@snip [RouterSpec.scala](/akka-actor-typed-tests/src/test/scala/docs/akka/typed/RouterSpec.scala) { #pool }
@ -61,7 +71,7 @@ Since the receptionist is used this means the group router is cluster-aware out
messages to registered actors on any node in the cluster that is reachable. If no reachable actor exists the router
will fallback and route messages to actors on nodes marked as unreachable.
That the receptionist is used also means that the set of routees is eventually consistent, and that immediately when
That the receptionist is used also means that the set of routees is eventually consistent, and that immediately when
the group router is started the set of routees it knows about is empty, until it has seen a listing from the receptionist
it stashes incoming messages and forwards them as soon as it gets a listing from the receptionist.
@ -74,7 +84,6 @@ Scala
Java
: @@snip [RouterTest.java](/akka-actor-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/RouterTest.java) { #group }
## Routing strategies
There are three different strategies for selecting which routee a message is forwarded to that can be selected
@ -84,7 +93,7 @@ Scala
: @@snip [RouterSpec.scala](/akka-actor-typed-tests/src/test/scala/docs/akka/typed/RouterSpec.scala) { #strategy }
Java
: @@snip [RouterTest.java](/akka-actor-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/RouterTest.java) { #strategy }
: @@snip [RouterTest.java](/akka-actor-typed-tests/src/test/java/jdocs/akka/typed/RouterTest.java) { #strategy }
### Round Robin
@ -98,7 +107,6 @@ This is the default for pool routers as the pool of routees is expected to remai
An optional parameter `preferLocalRoutees` can be used for this strategy. Routers will only use routees located in local actor system if `preferLocalRoutees` is true and local routees do exist. The default value for this parameter is false.
### Random
Randomly selects a routee when a message is sent through the router.
@ -108,9 +116,9 @@ This is the default for group routers as the group of routees is expected to cha
An optional parameter `preferLocalRoutees` can be used for this strategy. Routers will only use routees located in local actor system if `preferLocalRoutees` is true and local routees do exist. The default value for this parameter is false.
### Consistent Hashing
Uses [consistent hashing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_hashing) to select a routee based
on the sent message. This [article](http://www.tom-e-white.com/2007/11/consistent-hashing.html)
on the sent message. This [article](http://www.tom-e-white.com/2007/11/consistent-hashing.html)
gives good insight into how consistent hashing is implemented.
Currently you have to define hashMapping of the router to map incoming messages to their consistent
@ -125,7 +133,7 @@ See also @ref[Akka Cluster Sharding](cluster-sharding.md) which provides stable
Note that if the routees are sharing a resource, the resource will determine if increasing the number of
actors will actually give higher throughput or faster answers. For example if the routees are CPU bound actors
it will not give better performance to create more routees than there are threads to execute the actors.
it will not give better performance to create more routees than there are threads to execute the actors.
Since the router itself is an actor and has a mailbox this means that messages are routed sequentially to the routees
where it can be processed in parallel (depending on the available threads in the dispatcher).