Merge pull request #20034 from akka/wip-19949-ANQ.count-loop-RK

fix endless loop race condition in NodeQueue, #19949

akka-actor/src/main/java/akka/dispatch/AbstractNodeQueue.java

@@ -11,11 +11,20 @@ import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
 /**
  * Lock-free MPSC linked queue implementation based on Dmitriy Vyukov's non-intrusive MPSC queue:
  * http://www.1024cores.net/home/lock-free-algorithms/queues/non-intrusive-mpsc-node-based-queue
+ * 
+ * This queue could be wait-free (i.e. without the spinning loops in peekNode and pollNode) if
+ * it were permitted to return null while the queue is not quite empty anymore but the enqueued
+ * element is not yet visible. This would break actor scheduling, though.
  */
 @SuppressWarnings("serial")
 public abstract class AbstractNodeQueue<T> extends AtomicReference<AbstractNodeQueue.Node<T>> {
-    // Extends AtomicReference for the "head" slot (which is the one that is appended to) since
-    // Unsafe does not expose XCHG operation intrinsically before JDK 8
+
+    /*
+     * Extends AtomicReference for the "head" slot (which is the one that is appended to) since
+     * there is nothing to be gained by going to all-out Unsafe usage—we’d have to do
+     * cache-line padding ourselves.
+     */
+  
     @SuppressWarnings("unused")
     private volatile Node<T> _tailDoNotCallMeDirectly;
 
@@ -25,10 +34,14 @@ public abstract class AbstractNodeQueue<T> extends AtomicReference<AbstractNodeQ
        set(n);
     }
 
-    /*
+    /**
+     * Query the queue tail for the next element without dequeuing it.
+     * 
      * Use this method only from the consumer thread!
      * 
      * !!! There is a copy of this code in pollNode() !!!
+     * 
+     * @return queue node with element inside if there was one, or null if there was none
      */
     @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
     protected final Node<T> peekNode() {
@@ -43,37 +56,83 @@ public abstract class AbstractNodeQueue<T> extends AtomicReference<AbstractNodeQ
         }
         return next;
     }
-    /*
+    
+    /**
+     * Query the queue tail for the next element without dequeuing it.
+     * 
      * Use this method only from the consumer thread!
+     * 
+     * @return element if there was one, or null if there was none
      */
     public final T peek() {
         final Node<T> n = peekNode();
         return (n != null) ? n.value : null;
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Add an element to the head of the queue.
+     * 
+     * This method can be used from any thread.
+     * 
+     * @param value the element to be added; must not be null
+     */
     public final void add(final T value) {
         final Node<T> n = new Node<T>(value);
         getAndSet(n).setNext(n);
     }
     
+    /**
+     * Add an element to the head of the queue, providing the queue node to be used.
+     * 
+     * This method can be used from any thread.
+     * 
+     * @param n the node containing the element to be added; both must not be null
+     */
     public final void addNode(final Node<T> n) {
         n.setNext(null);
         getAndSet(n).setNext(n);
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Query the queue whether it is empty right now.
+     * 
+     * This method can be used from any thread.
+     * 
+     * @return true if queue was empty at some point in the past
+     */
     public final boolean isEmpty() {
         return Unsafe.instance.getObjectVolatile(this, tailOffset) == get();
     }
 
+    /**
+     * This method returns an upper bound on the queue size at the time it
+     * starts executing. It may spuriously return smaller values (including
+     * zero) if the consumer pulls items out concurrently.
+     * 
+     * This method can be used from any thread.
+     * 
+     * @return an upper bound on queue length at some time in the past
+     */
+    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
     public final int count() {
         int count = 0;
-        for(Node<T> n = peekNode();n != null && count < Integer.MAX_VALUE; n = n.next())
+        final Node<T> head = get();
+        for(Node<T> n = ((Node<T>) Unsafe.instance.getObjectVolatile(this, tailOffset)).next();
+            n != null && count < Integer.MAX_VALUE; 
+            n = n.next()) {
           ++count;
+          // only iterate up to the point where head was when starting: this is a moving queue!
+          if (n == head) break;
+        }
         return count;
     }
 
-    /*
+    /**
+     * Pull one item from the queue’s tail if there is one.
+     * 
      * Use this method only from the consumer thread!
+     * 
+     * @return element if there was one, or null if there was none
      */
     public final T poll() {
         final Node<T> next = pollNode();
@@ -85,18 +144,23 @@ public abstract class AbstractNodeQueue<T> extends AtomicReference<AbstractNodeQ
         }
     }
     
-    /*
+    /**
+     * Pull one item from the queue, returning it within a queue node.
+     * 
      * Use this method only from the consumer thread!
+     * 
+     * @return queue node with element inside if there was one, or null if there was none
      */
     @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
     public final Node<T> pollNode() {
-      Node<T> tail;
-      Node<T> next;
-      for(;;) {
-        tail = ((Node<T>)Unsafe.instance.getObjectVolatile(this, tailOffset));
+      final Node<T> tail = (Node<T>) Unsafe.instance.getObjectVolatile(this, tailOffset);
+      Node<T> next = tail.next();
+      if (next == null && get() != tail) {
+          // if tail != head this is not going to change until producer makes progress
+          // we can avoid reading the head and just spin on next until it shows up
+          do {
               next = tail.next();
-        if (next != null || get() == tail)
-          break;
+          } while (next == null);
       }
       if (next == null) return null;
       else {

akka-actor/src/main/scala/akka/dispatch/Mailbox.scala

@@ -619,8 +619,11 @@ object UnboundedMailbox {
 
 /**
  * SingleConsumerOnlyUnboundedMailbox is a high-performance, multiple producer—single consumer, unbounded MailboxType,
- * the only drawback is that you can't have multiple consumers,
+ * with the drawback that you can't have multiple consumers,
  * which rules out using it with BalancingPool (BalancingDispatcher) for instance.
+ *
+ * Currently this queue is slower for some benchmarks than the ConcurrentLinkedQueue from JDK 8 that is used by default,
+ * so be sure to measure the performance in your particular setting in order to determine which one to use.
  */
 final case class SingleConsumerOnlyUnboundedMailbox() extends MailboxType with ProducesMessageQueue[NodeMessageQueue] {
 

akka-bench-jmh/src/main/scala/akka/dispatch/NodeQueueBenchmark.scala

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/**
+ * Copyright (C) 2016 Lightbend Inc. <http://www.lightbend.com>
+ */
+package akka.dispatch
+
+import akka.actor._
+import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations._
+import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
+import scala.concurrent.Await
+import scala.concurrent.duration._
+import akka.testkit.TestProbe
+
+object NodeQueueBenchmark {
+  final val burst = 100000
+  case object Stop
+}
+
+@State(Scope.Benchmark)
+@BenchmarkMode(Array(Mode.Throughput))
+@Fork(2)
+@Warmup(iterations = 5)
+@Measurement(iterations = 10)
+@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.MICROSECONDS)
+class NodeQueueBenchmark {
+  import NodeQueueBenchmark._
+
+  val config = ConfigFactory.parseString("""
+dispatcher {
+  executor = "thread-pool-executor"
+  throughput = 1000
+  thread-pool-executor {
+    fixed-pool-size = 1
+  }
+}
+mailbox {
+  mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.SingleConsumerOnlyUnboundedMailbox"
+  mailbox-capacity = 1000000
+}
+""").withFallback(ConfigFactory.load())
+  implicit val sys = ActorSystem("ANQ", config)
+  val ref = sys.actorOf(Props(new Actor {
+    def receive = {
+      case Stop => sender() ! Stop
+      case _    =>
+    }
+  }).withDispatcher("dispatcher").withMailbox("mailbox"), "receiver")
+
+  @TearDown
+  def teardown(): Unit = Await.result(sys.terminate(), 5.seconds)
+
+  @TearDown(Level.Invocation)
+  def waitInBetween(): Unit = {
+    val probe = TestProbe()
+    probe.send(ref, Stop)
+    probe.expectMsg(Stop)
+    System.gc()
+    System.gc()
+    System.gc()
+  }
+
+  @Benchmark
+  @OperationsPerInvocation(burst)
+  def send(): Unit = {
+    var todo = burst
+    while (todo > 0) {
+      ref ! "hello"
+      todo -= 1
+    }
+  }
+
+}

akka-docs/rst/java/mailboxes.rst

@@ -124,7 +124,9 @@ Akka comes shipped with a number of mailbox implementations:
 
 * **SingleConsumerOnlyUnboundedMailbox**
 
-  - Backed by a very efficient Multiple-Producer Single-Consumer queue, cannot be used with ``BalancingDispatcher``
+  This queue may or may not be faster than the default one depending on your use-case—be sure to benchmark properly!
+
+  - Backed by a Multiple-Producer Single-Consumer queue, cannot be used with ``BalancingDispatcher``
 
   - Blocking: No
 

akka-docs/rst/scala/mailboxes.rst

@@ -124,7 +124,9 @@ Akka comes shipped with a number of mailbox implementations:
 
 * **SingleConsumerOnlyUnboundedMailbox**
 
-  - Backed by a very efficient Multiple-Producer Single-Consumer queue, cannot be used with ``BalancingDispatcher``
+  This queue may or may not be faster than the default one depending on your use-case—be sure to benchmark properly!
+
+  - Backed by a Multiple-Producer Single-Consumer queue, cannot be used with ``BalancingDispatcher``
 
   - Blocking: No