Removing getSupervisor and supervisor from ActorRef, doesn't make sense in a distributed setting

This commit is contained in:
Viktor Klang 2011-10-03 20:29:41 +02:00
parent 0f049d67e6
commit 284a8c4d05
3 changed files with 1 additions and 31 deletions

View file

@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ object ActorSerialization {
replicationScheme: ReplicationScheme): Array[Byte] =
toBinary(a, srlMailBox, replicationScheme)
@deprecated("BROKEN, REMOVE ME")
private[akka] def toSerializedActorRefProtocol[T <: Actor](
actorRef: ActorRef,
serializeMailBox: Boolean,
@ -63,13 +64,6 @@ object ActorSerialization {
case _ None
}
val lifeCycleProtocol: Option[LifeCycleProtocol] = None /*{
actorRef.lifeCycle match {
case Permanent Some(LifeCycleProtocol.newBuilder.setLifeCycle(LifeCycleType.PERMANENT).build)
case Temporary Some(LifeCycleProtocol.newBuilder.setLifeCycle(LifeCycleType.TEMPORARY).build)
}
}*/
val builder = SerializedActorRefProtocol.newBuilder
.setUuid(UuidProtocol.newBuilder.setHigh(actorRef.uuid.getTime).setLow(actorRef.uuid.getClockSeqAndNode).build)
.setAddress(actorRef.address)
@ -96,9 +90,6 @@ object ActorSerialization {
builder.setReplicationStrategy(strategyType)
}
lifeCycleProtocol.foreach(builder.setLifeCycle(_))
actorRef.supervisor.foreach(s builder.setSupervisor(RemoteActorSerialization.toRemoteActorRefProtocol(s)))
localRef foreach { l
if (serializeMailBox) {
l.underlying.mailbox match {