Merge paradox/scala/howto.md and java/howto.md (#23159)
This commit is contained in:
parent
b05cd61ca2
commit
1d2748cad2
2 changed files with 63 additions and 85 deletions
|
|
@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
|
|||
# HowTo: Common Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
This section lists common actor patterns which have been found to be useful,
|
||||
elegant or instructive. Anything is welcome, example topics being message
|
||||
routing strategies, supervision patterns, restart handling, etc. As a special
|
||||
bonus, additions to this section are marked with the contributor’s name, and it
|
||||
would be nice if every Akka user who finds a recurring pattern in his or her
|
||||
code could share it for the profit of all. Where applicable it might also make
|
||||
sense to add to the `akka.pattern` package for creating an [OTP-like library](http://www.erlang.org/doc/man_index.html).
|
||||
|
||||
You might find some of the patterns described in the Scala chapter of
|
||||
@ref:[HowTo: Common Patterns](howto.md) useful even though the example code is written in Scala.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scheduling Periodic Messages
|
||||
|
||||
This pattern describes how to schedule periodic messages to yourself in two different
|
||||
ways.
|
||||
|
||||
The first way is to set up periodic message scheduling in the constructor of the actor,
|
||||
and cancel that scheduled sending in `postStop` or else we might have multiple registered
|
||||
message sends to the same actor.
|
||||
|
||||
@@@ note
|
||||
|
||||
With this approach the scheduled periodic message send will be restarted with the actor on restarts.
|
||||
This also means that the time period that elapses between two tick messages during a restart may drift
|
||||
off based on when you restart the scheduled message sends relative to the time that the last message was
|
||||
sent, and how long the initial delay is. Worst case scenario is `interval` plus `initialDelay`.
|
||||
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
|
||||
@@snip [SchedulerPatternTest.java]($code$/java/jdocs/pattern/SchedulerPatternTest.java) { #schedule-constructor }
|
||||
|
||||
The second variant sets up an initial one shot message send in the `preStart` method
|
||||
of the actor, and the then the actor when it receives this message sets up a new one shot
|
||||
message send. You also have to override `postRestart` so we don't call `preStart`
|
||||
and schedule the initial message send again.
|
||||
|
||||
@@@ note
|
||||
|
||||
With this approach we won't fill up the mailbox with tick messages if the actor is
|
||||
under pressure, but only schedule a new tick message when we have seen the previous one.
|
||||
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
|
||||
@@snip [SchedulerPatternTest.java]($code$/java/jdocs/pattern/SchedulerPatternTest.java) { #schedule-receive }
|
||||
|
||||
## Single-Use Actor Trees with High-Level Error Reporting
|
||||
|
||||
*Contributed by: Rick Latrine*
|
||||
|
||||
A nice way to enter the actor world from java is the use of Patterns.ask().
|
||||
This method starts a temporary actor to forward the message and collect the result from the actor to be "asked".
|
||||
In case of errors within the asked actor the default supervision handling will take over.
|
||||
The caller of Patterns.ask() will *not* be notified.
|
||||
|
||||
If that caller is interested in such an exception, they must make sure that the asked actor replies with Status.Failure(Throwable).
|
||||
Behind the asked actor a complex actor hierarchy might be spawned to accomplish asynchronous work.
|
||||
Then supervision is the established way to control error handling.
|
||||
|
||||
Unfortunately the asked actor must know about supervision and must catch the exceptions.
|
||||
Such an actor is unlikely to be reused in a different actor hierarchy and contains crippled try/catch blocks.
|
||||
|
||||
This pattern provides a way to encapsulate supervision and error propagation to the temporary actor.
|
||||
Finally the promise returned by Patterns.ask() is fulfilled as a failure, including the exception
|
||||
(see also @ref:[Java 8 and Scala Compatibility](scala-compat.md) for Java compatibility).
|
||||
|
||||
Let's have a look at the example code:
|
||||
|
||||
@@snip [SupervisedAsk.java]($code$/java/jdocs/pattern/SupervisedAsk.java)
|
||||
|
||||
In the askOf method the SupervisorCreator is sent the user message.
|
||||
The SupervisorCreator creates a SupervisorActor and forwards the message.
|
||||
This prevents the actor system from overloading due to actor creations.
|
||||
The SupervisorActor is responsible to create the user actor, forwards the message, handles actor termination and supervision.
|
||||
Additionally the SupervisorActor stops the user actor if execution time expired.
|
||||
|
||||
In case of an exception the supervisor tells the temporary actor which exception was thrown.
|
||||
Afterwards the actor hierarchy is stopped.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally we are able to execute an actor and receive the results or exceptions.
|
||||
|
||||
@@snip [SupervisedAskSpec.java]($code$/java/jdocs/pattern/SupervisedAskSpec.java)
|
||||
1
akka-docs/src/main/paradox/java/howto.md
Symbolic link
1
akka-docs/src/main/paradox/java/howto.md
Symbolic link
|
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
../scala/howto.md
|
||||
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,15 @@ would be nice if every Akka user who finds a recurring pattern in his or her
|
|||
code could share it for the profit of all. Where applicable it might also make
|
||||
sense to add to the `akka.pattern` package for creating an [OTP-like library](http://www.erlang.org/doc/man_index.html).
|
||||
|
||||
@@@ div { .group-java }
|
||||
|
||||
You might find some of the patterns described in the Scala chapter of
|
||||
this page useful even though the example code is written in Scala.
|
||||
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
|
||||
@@@ div { .group-scala }
|
||||
|
||||
## Throttling Messages
|
||||
|
||||
Contributed by: Kaspar Fischer
|
||||
|
|
@ -109,6 +118,8 @@ This is where the Spider pattern comes in."
|
|||
|
||||
The pattern is described [Discovering Message Flows in Actor System with the Spider Pattern](http://letitcrash.com/post/30585282971/discovering-message-flows-in-actor-systems-with-the).
|
||||
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
|
||||
## Scheduling Periodic Messages
|
||||
|
||||
This pattern describes how to schedule periodic messages to yourself in two different
|
||||
|
|
@ -127,7 +138,11 @@ sent, and how long the initial delay is. Worst case scenario is `interval` plus
|
|||
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
|
||||
@@snip [SchedulerPatternSpec.scala]($code$/scala/docs/pattern/SchedulerPatternSpec.scala) { #schedule-constructor }
|
||||
Scala
|
||||
: @@snip [SchedulerPatternSpec.scala]($code$/scala/docs/pattern/SchedulerPatternSpec.scala) { #schedule-constructor }
|
||||
|
||||
Java
|
||||
: @@snip [SchedulerPatternTest.java]($code$/java/jdocs/pattern/SchedulerPatternTest.java) { #schedule-constructor }
|
||||
|
||||
The second variant sets up an initial one shot message send in the `preStart` method
|
||||
of the actor, and the then the actor when it receives this message sets up a new one shot
|
||||
|
|
@ -141,4 +156,49 @@ under pressure, but only schedule a new tick message when we have seen the previ
|
|||
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
|
||||
@@snip [SchedulerPatternSpec.scala]($code$/scala/docs/pattern/SchedulerPatternSpec.scala) { #schedule-receive }
|
||||
Scala
|
||||
: @@snip [SchedulerPatternSpec.scala]($code$/scala/docs/pattern/SchedulerPatternSpec.scala) { #schedule-receive }
|
||||
|
||||
Java
|
||||
: @@snip [SchedulerPatternTest.java]($code$/java/jdocs/pattern/SchedulerPatternTest.java) { #schedule-receive }
|
||||
|
||||
@@@ div { .group-java }
|
||||
|
||||
## Single-Use Actor Trees with High-Level Error Reporting
|
||||
|
||||
*Contributed by: Rick Latrine*
|
||||
|
||||
A nice way to enter the actor world from java is the use of Patterns.ask().
|
||||
This method starts a temporary actor to forward the message and collect the result from the actor to be "asked".
|
||||
In case of errors within the asked actor the default supervision handling will take over.
|
||||
The caller of Patterns.ask() will *not* be notified.
|
||||
|
||||
If that caller is interested in such an exception, they must make sure that the asked actor replies with Status.Failure(Throwable).
|
||||
Behind the asked actor a complex actor hierarchy might be spawned to accomplish asynchronous work.
|
||||
Then supervision is the established way to control error handling.
|
||||
|
||||
Unfortunately the asked actor must know about supervision and must catch the exceptions.
|
||||
Such an actor is unlikely to be reused in a different actor hierarchy and contains crippled try/catch blocks.
|
||||
|
||||
This pattern provides a way to encapsulate supervision and error propagation to the temporary actor.
|
||||
Finally the promise returned by Patterns.ask() is fulfilled as a failure, including the exception
|
||||
(see also @ref:[Java 8 and Scala Compatibility](scala-compat.md) for Java compatibility).
|
||||
|
||||
Let's have a look at the example code:
|
||||
|
||||
@@snip [SupervisedAsk.java]($code$/java/jdocs/pattern/SupervisedAsk.java)
|
||||
|
||||
In the askOf method the SupervisorCreator is sent the user message.
|
||||
The SupervisorCreator creates a SupervisorActor and forwards the message.
|
||||
This prevents the actor system from overloading due to actor creations.
|
||||
The SupervisorActor is responsible to create the user actor, forwards the message, handles actor termination and supervision.
|
||||
Additionally the SupervisorActor stops the user actor if execution time expired.
|
||||
|
||||
In case of an exception the supervisor tells the temporary actor which exception was thrown.
|
||||
Afterwards the actor hierarchy is stopped.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally we are able to execute an actor and receive the results or exceptions.
|
||||
|
||||
@@snip [SupervisedAskSpec.java]($code$/java/jdocs/pattern/SupervisedAskSpec.java)
|
||||
|
||||
@@@
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue