Merge pull request #481 from akka/wip-2136-balancing-routees-√
Wip 2136 balancing routees √
This commit is contained in:
commit
0bb72ef692
7 changed files with 42 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -42,27 +42,27 @@ class ActorConfigurationVerificationSpec extends AkkaSpec(ActorConfigurationVeri
|
|||
"An Actor configured with a BalancingDispatcher" must {
|
||||
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a RoundRobinRouter" in {
|
||||
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(RoundRobinRouter(2)))
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(RoundRobinRouter(2).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a BroadcastRouter" in {
|
||||
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(BroadcastRouter(2)))
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(BroadcastRouter(2).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a RandomRouter" in {
|
||||
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(RandomRouter(2)))
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(RandomRouter(2).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a SmallestMailboxRouter" in {
|
||||
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(SmallestMailboxRouter(2)))
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(SmallestMailboxRouter(2).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a ScatterGatherFirstCompletedRouter" in {
|
||||
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(ScatterGatherFirstCompletedRouter(nrOfInstances = 2, within = 2 seconds)))
|
||||
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(ScatterGatherFirstCompletedRouter(nrOfInstances = 2, within = 2 seconds).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
"not fail verification with a ConfigurationException also not configured with a Router" in {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -128,6 +128,35 @@ class ResizerSpec extends AkkaSpec(ResizerSpec.config) with DefaultTimeout with
|
|||
current.routees.size must be(2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
"resize when busy" ignore {
|
||||
|
||||
val busy = new TestLatch(1)
|
||||
|
||||
val resizer = DefaultResizer(
|
||||
lowerBound = 1,
|
||||
upperBound = 3,
|
||||
pressureThreshold = 0,
|
||||
messagesPerResize = 1)
|
||||
|
||||
val router = system.actorOf(Props[BusyActor].withRouter(RoundRobinRouter(resizer = Some(resizer))).withDispatcher("bal-disp"))
|
||||
|
||||
val latch1 = new TestLatch(1)
|
||||
router ! (latch1, busy)
|
||||
Await.ready(latch1, 2 seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
val latch2 = new TestLatch(1)
|
||||
router ! (latch2, busy)
|
||||
Await.ready(latch2, 2 seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
val latch3 = new TestLatch(1)
|
||||
router ! (latch3, busy)
|
||||
Await.ready(latch3, 2 seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
Await.result(router ? CurrentRoutees, 5 seconds).asInstanceOf[RouterRoutees].routees.size must be(3)
|
||||
|
||||
busy.countDown()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
"grow as needed under pressure" in {
|
||||
// make sure the pool starts at the expected lower limit and grows to the upper as needed
|
||||
// as influenced by the backlog of blocking pooled actors
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ private[akka] class RoutedActorRef(_system: ActorSystemImpl, _props: Props, _sup
|
|||
_path) {
|
||||
|
||||
// verify that a BalancingDispatcher is not used with a Router
|
||||
if (_system.dispatchers.isBalancingDispatcher(_props.dispatcher) && _props.routerConfig != NoRouter)
|
||||
if (_props.routerConfig != NoRouter && _system.dispatchers.isBalancingDispatcher(_props.routerConfig.routerDispatcher))
|
||||
throw new ConfigurationException(
|
||||
"Configuration for actor [" + _path.toString +
|
||||
"] is invalid - you can not use a 'BalancingDispatcher' together with any type of 'Router'")
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ There are 4 different types of message dispatchers:
|
|||
"thread-pool-executor" or the FQCN of
|
||||
an ``akka.dispatcher.ExecutorServiceConfigurator``
|
||||
|
||||
- Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` together with any kind of ``Router``, trying to do so will make your actor fail verification.
|
||||
- Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` as a **Router Dispatcher**. (You can however use it for the **Routees**)
|
||||
|
||||
* CallingThreadDispatcher
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ The dispatcher for created children of the router will be taken from
|
|||
makes sense to configure the :class:`BalancingDispatcher` if the precise
|
||||
routing is not so important (i.e. no consistent hashing or round-robin is
|
||||
required); this enables newly created routees to pick up work immediately by
|
||||
stealing it from their siblings. Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher``
|
||||
together with any kind of ``Router``, trying to do so will make your actor fail verification.
|
||||
stealing it from their siblings. Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` as a **Router Dispatcher**.
|
||||
(You can however use it for the **Routees**)
|
||||
|
||||
The “head” router, of course, cannot run on the same balancing dispatcher,
|
||||
because it does not process the same messages, hence this special actor does
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ There are 4 different types of message dispatchers:
|
|||
"thread-pool-executor" or the FQCN of
|
||||
an ``akka.dispatcher.ExecutorServiceConfigurator``
|
||||
|
||||
- Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` together with any kind of ``Router``, trying to do so will make your actor fail verification.
|
||||
- Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` as a **Router Dispatcher**. (You can however use it for the **Routees**)
|
||||
|
||||
* CallingThreadDispatcher
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ And then using it:
|
|||
|
||||
.. includecode:: ../scala/code/docs/dispatcher/DispatcherDocSpec.scala#defining-pinned-dispatcher
|
||||
|
||||
Note that ``thread-pool-executor`` configuration as per the above ``my-thread-pool-dispatcher`` exmaple is
|
||||
Note that ``thread-pool-executor`` configuration as per the above ``my-thread-pool-dispatcher`` example is
|
||||
NOT applicable. This is because every actor will have its own thread pool when using ``PinnedDispatcher``,
|
||||
and that pool will have only one thread.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ The dispatcher for created children of the router will be taken from
|
|||
makes sense to configure the :class:`BalancingDispatcher` if the precise
|
||||
routing is not so important (i.e. no consistent hashing or round-robin is
|
||||
required); this enables newly created routees to pick up work immediately by
|
||||
stealing it from their siblings. Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher``
|
||||
together with any kind of ``Router``, trying to do so will make your actor fail verification.
|
||||
stealing it from their siblings. Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` as a **Router Dispatcher**.
|
||||
(You can however use it for the **Routees**)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue