#2136 - Making it possible to use balancing dispatcher for routees but not routers, changing the docs and updating the tests

This commit is contained in:
Viktor Klang 2012-05-25 17:42:12 +02:00
parent 52875d3586
commit 021d7fcfeb
6 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions

View file

@ -42,27 +42,27 @@ class ActorConfigurationVerificationSpec extends AkkaSpec(ActorConfigurationVeri
"An Actor configured with a BalancingDispatcher" must {
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a RoundRobinRouter" in {
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(RoundRobinRouter(2)))
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(RoundRobinRouter(2).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
}
}
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a BroadcastRouter" in {
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(BroadcastRouter(2)))
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(BroadcastRouter(2).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
}
}
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a RandomRouter" in {
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(RandomRouter(2)))
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(RandomRouter(2).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
}
}
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a SmallestMailboxRouter" in {
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(SmallestMailboxRouter(2)))
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(SmallestMailboxRouter(2).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
}
}
"fail verification with a ConfigurationException if also configured with a ScatterGatherFirstCompletedRouter" in {
intercept[ConfigurationException] {
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher").withRouter(ScatterGatherFirstCompletedRouter(nrOfInstances = 2, within = 2 seconds)))
system.actorOf(Props[TestActor].withRouter(ScatterGatherFirstCompletedRouter(nrOfInstances = 2, within = 2 seconds).withDispatcher("balancing-dispatcher")))
}
}
"not fail verification with a ConfigurationException also not configured with a Router" in {

View file

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ private[akka] class RoutedActorRef(_system: ActorSystemImpl, _props: Props, _sup
_path) {
// verify that a BalancingDispatcher is not used with a Router
if (_system.dispatchers.isBalancingDispatcher(_props.dispatcher) && _props.routerConfig != NoRouter)
if (_props.routerConfig != NoRouter && _system.dispatchers.isBalancingDispatcher(_props.routerConfig.routerDispatcher))
throw new ConfigurationException(
"Configuration for actor [" + _path.toString +
"] is invalid - you can not use a 'BalancingDispatcher' together with any type of 'Router'")

View file

@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ There are 4 different types of message dispatchers:
"thread-pool-executor" or the FQCN of
an ``akka.dispatcher.ExecutorServiceConfigurator``
- Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` together with any kind of ``Router``, trying to do so will make your actor fail verification.
- Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` as a **Router Dispatcher**. (You can however use it for the **Routees**)
* CallingThreadDispatcher

View file

@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ The dispatcher for created children of the router will be taken from
makes sense to configure the :class:`BalancingDispatcher` if the precise
routing is not so important (i.e. no consistent hashing or round-robin is
required); this enables newly created routees to pick up work immediately by
stealing it from their siblings. Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher``
together with any kind of ``Router``, trying to do so will make your actor fail verification.
stealing it from their siblings. Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` as a **Router Dispatcher**.
(You can however use it for the **Routees**)
The “head” router, of course, cannot run on the same balancing dispatcher,
because it does not process the same messages, hence this special actor does

View file

@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ There are 4 different types of message dispatchers:
"thread-pool-executor" or the FQCN of
an ``akka.dispatcher.ExecutorServiceConfigurator``
- Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` together with any kind of ``Router``, trying to do so will make your actor fail verification.
- Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` as a **Router Dispatcher**. (You can however use it for the **Routees**)
* CallingThreadDispatcher
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ And then using it:
.. includecode:: ../scala/code/docs/dispatcher/DispatcherDocSpec.scala#defining-pinned-dispatcher
Note that ``thread-pool-executor`` configuration as per the above ``my-thread-pool-dispatcher`` exmaple is
Note that ``thread-pool-executor`` configuration as per the above ``my-thread-pool-dispatcher`` example is
NOT applicable. This is because every actor will have its own thread pool when using ``PinnedDispatcher``,
and that pool will have only one thread.

View file

@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ The dispatcher for created children of the router will be taken from
makes sense to configure the :class:`BalancingDispatcher` if the precise
routing is not so important (i.e. no consistent hashing or round-robin is
required); this enables newly created routees to pick up work immediately by
stealing it from their siblings. Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher``
together with any kind of ``Router``, trying to do so will make your actor fail verification.
stealing it from their siblings. Note that you can **not** use a ``BalancingDispatcher`` as a **Router Dispatcher**.
(You can however use it for the **Routees**)
.. note::