2014-12-20 14:11:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
.. _quickstart-scala:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick Start: Reactive Tweets
|
|
|
|
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A typical use case for stream processing is consuming a live stream of data that we want to extract or aggregate some
|
|
|
|
|
|
other data from. In this example we'll consider consuming a stream of tweets and extracting information concerning Akka from them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will also consider the problem inherent to all non-blocking streaming solutions – "*What if the subscriber is slower
|
|
|
|
|
|
to consume the live stream of data?*" i.e. it is unable to keep up with processing the live data. Traditionally the solution
|
|
|
|
|
|
is often to buffer the elements, but this can (and usually *will*) cause eventual buffer overflows and instability of such systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead Akka Streams depend on internal backpressure signals that allow to control what should happen in such scenarios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's the data model we'll be working with throughout the quickstart examples:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transforming and consuming simple streams
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to prepare our environment by creating an :class:`ActorSystem` and :class:`FlowMaterializer`,
|
|
|
|
|
|
which will be responsible for materializing and running the streams we are about to create:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#materializer-setup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The :class:`FlowMaterializer` can optionally take :class:`MaterializerSettings` which can be used to define
|
|
|
|
|
|
materialization properties, such as default buffer sizes (see also :ref:`stream-buffering-explained-scala`), the dispatcher to
|
|
|
|
|
|
be used by the pipeline etc. These can be overridden on an element-by-element basis or for an entire section, but this
|
|
|
|
|
|
will be discussed in depth in :ref:`stream-section-configuration`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's assume we have a stream of tweets readily available, in Akka this is expressed as a :class:`Source[Out]`:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#tweet-source
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Streams always start flowing from a :class:`Source[Out]` then can continue through :class:`Flow[In,Out]` elements or
|
|
|
|
|
|
more advanced graph elements to finally be consumed by a :class:`Sink[In]`. Both Sources and Flows provide stream operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
that can be used to transform the flowing data, a :class:`Sink` however does not since its the "end of stream" and its
|
|
|
|
|
|
behavior depends on the type of :class:`Sink` used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In our case let's say we want to find all twitter handles of users which tweet about ``#akka``, the operations should look
|
|
|
|
|
|
familiar to anyone who has used the Scala Collections library, however they operate on streams and not collections of data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#authors-filter-map
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally in order to :ref:`materialize <stream-materialization-scala>` and run the stream computation we need to attach
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Flow to a :class:`Sink[T]` that will get the flow running. The simplest way to do this is to call
|
|
|
|
|
|
``runWith(sink)`` on a ``Source[Out]``. For convenience a number of common Sinks are predefined and collected as methods on
|
|
|
|
|
|
the :class:``Sink`` `companion object <http://doc.akka.io/api/akka-stream-and-http-experimental/1.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/#akka.stream.scaladsl.Sink$>`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For now let's simply print each author:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#authors-foreachsink-println
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or by using the shorthand version (which are defined only for the most popular sinks such as :class:`FoldSink` and :class:`ForeachSink`):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#authors-foreach-println
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materializing and running a stream always requires a :class:`FlowMaterializer` to be in implicit scope (or passed in explicitly,
|
|
|
|
|
|
like this: ``.run(mat)``).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flattening sequences in streams
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the previous section we were working on 1:1 relationships of elements which is the most common case, but sometimes
|
|
|
|
|
|
we might want to map from one element to a number of elements and receive a "flattened" stream, similarly like ``flatMap``
|
|
|
|
|
|
works on Scala Collections. In order to get a flattened stream of hashtags from our stream of tweets we can use the ``mapConcat``
|
|
|
|
|
|
combinator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#hashtags-mapConcat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name ``flatMap`` was consciously avoided due to its proximity with for-comprehensions and monadic composition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is problematic for two reasons: firstly, flattening by concatenation is often undesirable in bounded stream processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
due to the risk of deadlock (with merge being the preferred strategy), and secondly, the monad laws would not hold for
|
|
|
|
|
|
our implementation of flatMap (due to the liveness issues).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please note that the mapConcat requires the supplied function to return a strict collection (``f:Out⇒immutable.Seq[T]``),
|
|
|
|
|
|
whereas ``flatMap`` would have to operate on streams all the way through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcasting a stream
|
|
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now let's say we want to persist all hashtags, as well as all author names from this one live stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example we'd like to write all author handles into one file, and all hashtags into another file on disk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means we have to split the source stream into 2 streams which will handle the writing to these different files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elements that can be used to form such "fan-out" (or "fan-in") structures are referred to as "junctions" in Akka Streams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of these that we'll be using in this example is called :class:`Broadcast`, and it simply emits elements from its
|
|
|
|
|
|
input port to all of its output ports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Akka Streams intentionally separate the linear stream structures (Flows) from the non-linear, branching ones (FlowGraphs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
in order to offer the most convenient API for both of these cases. Graphs can express arbitrarily complex stream setups
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the expense of not reading as familiarly as collection transformations. It is also possible to wrap complex computation
|
|
|
|
|
|
graphs as Flows, Sinks or Sources, which will be explained in detail in :ref:`constructing-sources-sinks-flows-from-partial-graphs-scala`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FlowGraphs are constructed like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#flow-graph-broadcast
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``~>`` (read as "edge", "via" or "to") operator is only available if ``FlowGraphImplicits._`` are imported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without this import you can still construct graphs using the ``builder.addEdge(from,[through,]to)`` method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As you can see, inside the :class:`FlowGraph` we use an implicit graph builder to mutably construct the graph
|
|
|
|
|
|
using the ``~>`` "edge operator" (also read as "connect" or "via" or "to"). Once we have the FlowGraph in the value ``g``
|
|
|
|
|
|
*it is immutable, thread-safe, and freely shareable*. A graph can can be ``run()`` directly - assuming all
|
|
|
|
|
|
ports (sinks/sources) within a flow have been connected properly. It is possible to construct :class:`PartialFlowGraph` s
|
|
|
|
|
|
where this is not required but this will be covered in detail in :ref:`partial-flow-graph-scala`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As all Akka Streams elements, :class:`Broadcast` will properly propagate back-pressure to its upstream element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back-pressure in action
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the main advantages of Akka Streams is that they *always* propagate back-pressure information from stream Sinks
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Subscribers) to their Sources (Publishers). It is not an optional feature, and is enabled at all times. To learn more
|
|
|
|
|
|
about the back-pressure protocol used by Akka Streams and all other Reactive Streams compatible implementations read
|
|
|
|
|
|
:ref:`back-pressure-explained-scala`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A typical problem applications (not using Akka Streams) like this often face is that they are unable to process the incoming data fast enough,
|
|
|
|
|
|
either temporarily or by design, and will start buffering incoming data until there's no more space to buffer, resulting
|
|
|
|
|
|
in either ``OutOfMemoryError`` s or other severe degradations of service responsiveness. With Akka Streams buffering can
|
|
|
|
|
|
and must be handled explicitly. For example, if we are only interested in the "*most recent tweets, with a buffer of 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
elements*" this can be expressed using the ``buffer`` element:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#tweets-slow-consumption-dropHead
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``buffer`` element takes an explicit and required ``OverflowStrategy``, which defines how the buffer should react
|
|
|
|
|
|
when it receives another element element while it is full. Strategies provided include dropping the oldest element (``dropHead``),
|
|
|
|
|
|
dropping the entire buffer, signalling errors etc. Be sure to pick and choose the strategy that fits your use case best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materialized values
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
So far we've been only processing data using Flows and consuming it into some kind of external Sink - be it by printing
|
|
|
|
|
|
values or storing them in some external system. However sometimes we may be interested in some value that can be
|
|
|
|
|
|
obtained from the materialized processing pipeline. For example, we want to know how many tweets we have processed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
While this question is not as obvious to give an answer to in case of an infinite stream of tweets (one way to answer
|
|
|
|
|
|
this question in a streaming setting would to create a stream of counts described as "*up until now*, we've processed N tweets"),
|
|
|
|
|
|
but in general it is possible to deal with finite streams and come up with a nice result such as a total count of elements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, let's write such an element counter using :class:`FoldSink` and then we'll see how it is possible to obtain materialized
|
|
|
|
|
|
values from a :class:`MaterializedMap` which is returned by materializing an Akka stream. We'll split execution into multiple
|
|
|
|
|
|
lines for the sake of explaining the concepts of ``Materializable`` elements and ``MaterializedType``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#tweets-fold-count
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, we prepare the :class:`FoldSink` which will be used to sum all ``Int`` elements of the stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next we connect the ``tweets`` stream though a ``map`` step which converts each tweet into the number ``1``,
|
|
|
|
|
|
finally we connect the flow ``to`` the previously prepared Sink. Notice that this step does *not* yet materialize the
|
|
|
|
|
|
processing pipeline, it merely prepares the description of the Flow, which is now connected to a Sink, and therefore can
|
|
|
|
|
|
be ``run()``, as indicated by its type: :class:`RunnableFlow`. Next we call ``run()`` which uses the implicit :class:`FlowMaterializer`
|
|
|
|
|
|
to materialize and run the flow. The value returned by calling ``run()`` on a ``RunnableFlow`` or ``FlowGraph`` is ``MaterializedMap``,
|
|
|
|
|
|
which can be used to retrieve materialized values from the running stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to extract an materialized value from a running stream it is possible to call ``get(Materializable)`` on a materialized map
|
|
|
|
|
|
obtained from materializing a flow or graph. Since ``FoldSink`` implements ``Materializable`` and implements the ``MaterializedType``
|
|
|
|
|
|
as ``Future[Int]`` we can use it to obtain the :class:`Future` which when completed will contain the total length of our tweets stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In case of the stream failing, this future would complete with a Failure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reason we have to ``get`` the value out from the materialized map, is because a :class:`RunnableFlow` may be reused
|
|
|
|
|
|
and materialized multiple times, because it is just the "blueprint" of the stream. This means that if we materialize a stream,
|
|
|
|
|
|
for example one that consumes a live stream of tweets within a minute, the materialized values for those two materializations
|
|
|
|
|
|
will be different, as illustrated by this example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#tweets-runnable-flow-materialized-twice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many elements in Akka Streams provide materialized values which can be used for obtaining either results of computation or
|
|
|
|
|
|
steering these elements which will be discussed in detail in :ref:`stream-materialization-scala`. Summing up this section, now we know
|
|
|
|
|
|
what happens behind the scenes when we run this one-liner, which is equivalent to the multi line version above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. includecode:: code/docs/stream/TwitterStreamQuickstartDocSpec.scala#tweets-fold-count-oneline
|